Measuring Progress:
Outcomes Valued by Service Recipients
and Steps Recommended to Achieve Them

planning icon

A Report of the Recipient Advisory Committee
September 2006

New York State Office of Mental Health

Recent research has helped to enrich our understanding of what people who are served by the mental health system say helps and hinders recovery. A number of common characteristics associated with recovery have been identified. These include having basic material resources (e.g., a livable wage, safe and affordable housing, access to general health care, transportation, and technology); significant social relationships with family and friends, including intimate relationships; meaningful activities that help to connect people to their communities (e.g., educational advancement, substantive role in the work place, volunteer and other community advocacy roles); a self-determined life that is defined by the person rather than a diagnosis; and a belief in hope and the ability to change and grow.1

As part of an effort to expand our growing understanding of recovery and to help develop indicators of progress for persons served within the public mental health system, the Commissioner's Recipient Advisory Committee met in the fall of 2006 to brainstorm what “life would look like if everything were successful.” The goal of the brainstorming session was to help the agency identify and track outcomes associated with healthy functioning, as a complement to the focus on measuring the short-term goals associated with services needed to achieve the longer-term outcomes.

The Recipient Advisory Committee is composed of recipients from all regions of the State. It meets quarterly, and invites participation at its meetings from interested recipients who might not necessarily be members of this advisory group. Approxi-mately 70 persons attended the September 19, 2006, meeting and contributed input into the picture of an ideal recovery. As a result of this meeting, the Committee has provided advice to the OMH Division of Planning and Division of Recipient Affairs on recovery outcomes for individuals with a psychiatric diagnosis. This paper provides an overview of information and recommendations provided.

Methods: Group Exercises

Led by John Allen, Director of Recipient Affairs, the brainstorming exercise involved eliciting responses to a series of questions about five major areas of functioning, based on characteristics associated with recovery. Divided into four groups, members considered the following two questions:

  1. What would your life look like if everything was successful and you had everything you needed to recover?
    1. What would you have?
    2. Where would you live?
    3. Who would you live with?
    4. What would you do for transportation?
    5. What would you do for recreation?
    6. What would you do for employment?
  2. What steps should be taken to reach the ideal?

Participants were asked to brainstorm, following usual brainstorming protocols, including the collection of as many ideas as possible from all participants without criticism or judgment as ideas are generated, and writing each idea on a flip chart so all participants could see them. Specifically, participants were asked to respond to the questions above within the discrete categories of a home, a car, a job, and friends and dates, all areas most anyone with or without a psychiatric diagnosis typically values. The following ideal definitions were provided to guide the brainstorming sessions:

The groups spent time considering steps they could take to reach the ideal, “because they are tangible expressions of what we want to accomplish in the short term.” Two persons facilitated each brainstorming and problem-solving group and captured ideas for further consideration in planning and priority setting.

Results of Recipient Advisory Committee Deliberations

The results are presented in four categories: home, car, job, and friends/dates. Overall, participants noted that is was a “great idea” to consider these issues, but “tough to think outside the box.” Additionally, data from a summary presented by John Allen as well as a look at gaps in the current service system are noted following the synopses of the four categories.

Home

Car

Job

Friends and dates

Themes Cutting across Groups

One group noted that a number of concepts cut across the four categories of having a home, a job, a car, friends, and dates. These include:

Other Themes Emerging from Group Discussions

In summarizing ideas to emerge from group discussions, Mr. Allen noted the following themes:

Opportunities for Improvement

A short discussion of what is missing in the service system or areas for improvement led to the identification of the following issues:

Next Steps

The summary of the day's deliberations has been shared with the Bureau of Recipient Affairs, which will share it with the Recipient Advisory Committee. The summary will also be incorporated into the fabric of planning processes within the Office of Mental Health.


  1. Onken SJ, Dumont JM, Ridgway P et al. (2002). Mental health recovery: What helps and what hinders. Alexandria, VA: National Technical Assistance Center for State Mental Health Planning, National Association of State Mental Health Program Directors. Available online at http://www.nasmhpd.org/generalfiles/publications/ntacpubs/reports/MHSIPReport.pdf